MICHAEL FOODS GROUP, INC.
CIK 1517224Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Fried FrankFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 540 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Kaplan Strangis and KaplanFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Mandelbaum SalsburgFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fried Frank | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 540 | 1.33 | 0.24 | 0.94 |
| Kaplan Strangis and Kaplan | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 24 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Mandelbaum Salsburg | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 12 | 0.00 | 1.41 | 0.76 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Marilyn FrenchHUTCHINS, WHEELER & DITTMARFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert C. SchwenkelFried FrankFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Todd R. ChandlerWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marilyn FrenchHUTCHINS, WHEELER & DITTMAR | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Robert C. SchwenkelFried Frank | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 25 | 1.16 | 0.00 | 1.25 |
| Todd R. ChandlerWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 38 | 0.35 | 0.00 | 0.78 |