Pingtan Marine Enterprise Ltd. PME (last ticker on record)
CIK 1517130Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Oct 2021
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alston & BirdFirst linked May 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 583 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLPFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 169 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in a filing · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Reed SmithFirst linked Oct 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in a filing · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in a filing · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Forbes HareFirst linked Apr 2013 · Text search only · 57 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 1.64× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Dacheng Law OfficesFirst linked Oct 2012 · Text search only · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Mourant Ozannes (Cayman)First linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- Guantao Law FirmFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.90× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alston & Bird | May 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 583 | 0.99 | 0.39 | 0.79 |
| Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP | Aug 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 169 | 0.88 | 0.82 | 1.25 |
| Maples and Calder | Aug 2016 | Named in a filing | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Reed Smith | Oct 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
| DLA Piper | Apr 2011 | Named in a filing | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Apr 2011 | Named in a filing | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Forbes Hare | Apr 2013 | Text search only | 57 | 1.00 | 1.64 | 0.82 |
| Dacheng Law Offices | Oct 2012 | Text search only | 50 | 1.71 | 0.69 | 1.09 |
| Mourant Ozannes (Cayman) | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 54 | 0.76 | 0.00 | 0.63 |
| Guantao Law Firm | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 22 | 1.90 | 1.03 | 0.98 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Katherine J. BlairManatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLPFirst linked Oct 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.97× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Thomas J. PolettiK&L GatesFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 71 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 1.24× · 95% wipeout 1.75×
- William N. HaddadVenable LLPFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katherine J. BlairManatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP | Oct 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 30 | 0.95 | 0.97 | 1.22 |
| Thomas J. PolettiK&L Gates | Aug 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 71 | 1.51 | 1.24 | 1.75 |
| William N. HaddadVenable LLP | Apr 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 40 | 1.71 | 0.41 | 1.36 |