Aleris International, Inc.
CIK 1516386Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jul 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 13
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker & HostetlerFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 231 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Fried FrankFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 540 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Morrison Cohen LLPFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 74 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.77× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Munger Tolles & OlsonFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 80 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Reed SmithFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Young Conaway Stargatt & TaylorFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.50× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker & Hostetler | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 231 | 1.11 | 1.12 | 1.35 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Fried Frank | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 540 | 1.33 | 0.24 | 0.94 |
| Morrison Cohen LLP | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 74 | 1.77 | 0.85 | 1.15 |
| Munger Tolles & Olson | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 80 | 1.57 | 0.00 | 0.87 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| Reed Smith | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Willkie Farr | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
| Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 36 | 1.50 | 0.00 | 1.23 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew B. BarkanFried FrankFirst linked Dec 2012 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.58×
- Bonnie A. BarsamianDechert LLPFirst linked May 2011 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Christopher EwanFried FrankFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 0.88× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Daniel J. BurskyFried FrankFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.33× · Went dark 1.50× · 95% wipeout 1.64×
- Kenneth M. SchneiderPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew B. BarkanFried Frank | Dec 2012 | Text search only | 24 | 0.72 | 0.00 | 1.58 |
| Bonnie A. BarsamianDechert LLP | May 2011 | Text search only | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Christopher EwanFried Frank | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 29 | 0.70 | 0.88 | 0.00 |
| Daniel J. BurskyFried Frank | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 28 | 0.33 | 1.50 | 1.64 |
| Kenneth M. SchneiderPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 23 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 0.54 |