North American Oil & Gas Corp. NAMG (last ticker on record)
CIK 1515635Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Restatement
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jun 2015
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Musick Peeler & GarrettFirst linked Mar 2013 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.47× · Went dark 1.05× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- J.M. Walker & AssociatesFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 73 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 1.67× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Musick Peeler & Garrett | Mar 2013 | Named in a filing | 18 | 0.47 | 1.05 | 1.11 |
| J.M. Walker & Associates | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 73 | 1.51 | 1.67 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sol V. SlotnikSOL V. SLOTNIK, P.C.First linked Dec 2014 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.65× · Went dark 2.39× · 95% wipeout 2.65×
- Matthew C. McMurdoNannarone & McMurdo, LLPFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 3.07× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Matthew McMurdoMcMurdo Law GroupFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in a filing · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 3.07× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Thomas E. PuzzoThomas E. Puzzo, PLLCFirst linked Nov 2012 · Named in a filing · 115 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 2.35× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Jody M. WalkerJ.M. Walker & AssociatesFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in a filing · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 1.51× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sol V. SlotnikSOL V. SLOTNIK, P.C. | Dec 2014 | Named in a filing | 6 | 2.65 | 2.39 | 2.65 |
| Matthew C. McMurdoNannarone & McMurdo, LLP | Apr 2014 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.88 | 3.07 | 1.48 |
| Matthew McMurdoMcMurdo Law Group | Apr 2014 | Named in a filing | 58 | 1.06 | 3.07 | 0.77 |
| Thomas E. PuzzoThomas E. Puzzo, PLLC | Nov 2012 | Named in a filing | 115 | 1.70 | 2.35 | 0.92 |
| Jody M. WalkerJ.M. Walker & Associates | Mar 2011 | Named in a filing | 102 | 1.52 | 1.51 | 0.86 |