Arq, Inc. ARQ (last ticker on record)
CIK 1515156Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Jan 2023
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPFirst linked May 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 138 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 4.29× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Jun 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Sherman & Howard L.L.C.First linked May 2017 · Named in a filing · 105 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Fortis Law PartnersFirst linked Jul 2013 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.23× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Fox Rothschild LLPFirst linked Mar 2013 · Text search only · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP | May 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 138 | 1.29 | 4.29 | 1.16 |
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Jun 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Sherman & Howard L.L.C. | May 2017 | Named in a filing | 105 | 1.02 | 0.99 | 1.48 |
| Fortis Law Partners | Jul 2013 | Named in a filing | 5 | 2.23 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Fox Rothschild LLP | Mar 2013 | Text search only | 149 | 0.92 | 1.38 | 0.90 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jeffrey A. ShermanFaegre & BensonFirst linked May 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 1.61× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Jonathan WhalenGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Jan 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Krista P. HanveyGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Jun 2022 · Named in a filing · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.46×
- Garth B. JensenHolme Roberts & Owen LLPFirst linked May 2017 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 1.51× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Steven D. MillerSherman & Howard L.L.C.First linked May 2017 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Julie A. HerzogFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey A. ShermanFaegre & Benson | May 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 0.79 | 1.61 | 1.21 |
| Jonathan WhalenGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Jan 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Krista P. HanveyGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Jun 2022 | Named in a filing | 31 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 0.46 |
| Garth B. JensenHolme Roberts & Owen LLP | May 2017 | Named in a filing | 22 | 1.12 | 1.51 | 1.36 |
| Steven D. MillerSherman & Howard L.L.C. | May 2017 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Julie A. Herzog | Mar 2011 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.38 | 0.00 | 0.80 |