SAExploration Holdings, Inc. SAEX (last ticker on record)
CIK 1514732Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 5
- Newest began Oct 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Sep 2013 to Oct 2020
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Porter & HedgesFirst linked Dec 2020 · Named in a filing · 108 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Akin GumpFirst linked Apr 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Strasburger & PriceFirst linked Mar 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.87× · Went dark 1.01× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in a filing · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Graubard MillerFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 418 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Clark HillFirst linked May 2019 · Text search only · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porter & Hedges | Dec 2020 | Named in a filing | 108 | 1.13 | 0.36 | 1.44 |
| Akin Gump | Apr 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Strasburger & Price | Mar 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 39 | 0.87 | 1.01 | 1.23 |
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Mar 2011 | Named in a filing | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Graubard Miller | Mar 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 418 | 0.92 | 0.75 | 1.16 |
| Clark Hill | May 2019 | Text search only | 51 | 1.57 | 0.00 | 0.70 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- E. James CowenPorter & HedgesFirst linked Dec 2020 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Chris CentrichPaul HastingsFirst linked Dec 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- David Alan MillerEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 231 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Douglas S. EllenoffEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in a filing · 338 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Jeffrey M. GallantGraubard MillerFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 195 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.64× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Stuart NeuhauserEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in a filing · 416 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E. James CowenPorter & Hedges | Dec 2020 | Named in a filing | 13 | 1.44 | 0.00 | 1.18 |
| Chris CentrichPaul Hastings | Dec 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 3.65 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| David Alan MillerEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Mar 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 231 | 1.06 | 0.74 | 1.33 |
| Douglas S. EllenoffEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Mar 2011 | Named in a filing | 338 | 0.95 | 0.66 | 0.95 |
| Jeffrey M. GallantGraubard Miller | Mar 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 195 | 0.96 | 0.64 | 1.20 |
| Stuart NeuhauserEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Mar 2011 | Named in a filing | 416 | 0.78 | 0.42 | 1.04 |