SunCoke Energy, Inc. SXC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1514705Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jul 2014
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Perkins CoieFirst linked Nov 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 511 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Baker Botts L.L.P.First linked Mar 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 495 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.09× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 783 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Barnes & ThornburgFirst linked Dec 2011 · Named in a filing · 167 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Dec 2011 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Williams MullenFirst linked Dec 2011 · Text search only · 113 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
- Drinker Biddle & ReathFirst linked Jul 2011 · Text search only · 213 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Jul 2011 · Text search only · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perkins Coie | Nov 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 511 | 0.93 | 0.27 | 0.98 |
| Baker Botts L.L.P. | Mar 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 495 | 1.32 | 0.09 | 1.03 |
| Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 783 | 1.09 | 0.11 | 1.03 |
| Barnes & Thornburg | Dec 2011 | Named in a filing | 167 | 1.07 | 0.70 | 0.86 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Dec 2011 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Mar 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Williams Mullen | Dec 2011 | Text search only | 113 | 0.92 | 0.00 | 0.67 |
| Drinker Biddle & Reath | Jul 2011 | Text search only | 213 | 1.46 | 0.77 | 1.25 |
| Maples and Calder | Jul 2011 | Text search only | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Mayer Brown | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Susan J. DaleyPerkins CoieFirst linked Jun 2022 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Allison C. HandyPerkins CoieFirst linked Nov 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.60×
- Mike RosenwasserVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Mar 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Michael J. BlankenshipWinston & StrawnFirst linked Nov 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 91 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.23× · Went dark 1.13× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Gillian A. HobsonVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Mar 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Michael J. SwidlerVinson & Elkins L.L.P.First linked Sep 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- David A. KatzWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 108 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- David K. LamWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in a filing · 110 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Susan J. DaleyPerkins Coie | Jun 2022 | Named in a filing | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Allison C. HandyPerkins Coie | Nov 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.55 | 0.00 | 0.60 |
| Mike RosenwasserVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Mar 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 0.31 | 0.00 | 0.79 |
| Michael J. BlankenshipWinston & Strawn | Nov 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 91 | 0.23 | 1.13 | 1.05 |
| Gillian A. HobsonVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Mar 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 1.07 | 0.00 | 1.28 |
| Michael J. SwidlerVinson & Elkins L.L.P. | Sep 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 1.30 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| David A. KatzWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Mar 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 108 | 1.44 | 0.00 | 0.70 |
| David K. LamWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Mar 2011 | Named in a filing | 110 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 0.52 |