Aravive, Inc. ARAV (last ticker on record)
CIK 1513818Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Aug 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jun 2020 to Jan 2024
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Blank RomeFirst linked Mar 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Gracin & Marlow, LLPFirst linked Aug 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 2.34× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Lowenstein SandlerFirst linked Aug 2018 · Text search only · 297 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Arnold & PorterFirst linked Mar 2014 · Text search only · 254 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLPFirst linked Mar 2014 · Text search only · 98 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 2014 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Jan 2014 · Text search only · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blank Rome | Mar 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.36 |
| Gracin & Marlow, LLP | Aug 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 55 | 0.97 | 2.34 | 1.38 |
| Cooley LLP | Jan 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Davis Polk | Jan 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Lowenstein Sandler | Aug 2018 | Text search only | 297 | 1.12 | 0.70 | 1.42 |
| Arnold & Porter | Mar 2014 | Text search only | 254 | 1.03 | 0.11 | 0.84 |
| Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP | Mar 2014 | Text search only | 98 | 0.65 | 0.85 | 1.34 |
| Goodwin Procter | Feb 2014 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Jan 2014 | Text search only | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hank GracinGracin & Marlow, LLPFirst linked Mar 2019 · Named in a filing · 77 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 2.28× · 95% wipeout 1.53×
- Leslie MarlowBlank RomeFirst linked Mar 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 71 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 2.60× · 95% wipeout 1.43×
- Patrick J. EganGracin & Marlow, LLPFirst linked Mar 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 1.84× · 95% wipeout 1.89×
- Barbara A. KosaczCooley LLPFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.75×
- Kenneth L. GuernseyCooley LLPFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.56× · Went dark 0.49× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Michael E. TentaCooley LLPFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Daniel I. GoldbergCooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2020 · Text search only · 184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Michael D. MalineGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Sep 2020 · Text search only · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hank GracinGracin & Marlow, LLP | Mar 2019 | Named in a filing | 77 | 0.66 | 2.28 | 1.53 |
| Leslie MarlowBlank Rome | Mar 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 71 | 0.58 | 2.60 | 1.43 |
| Patrick J. EganGracin & Marlow, LLP | Mar 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 43 | 0.40 | 1.84 | 1.89 |
| Barbara A. KosaczCooley LLP | Jan 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.75 |
| Kenneth L. GuernseyCooley LLP | Jan 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 51 | 0.56 | 0.49 | 1.38 |
| Michael E. TentaCooley LLP | Jan 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 1.48 |
| Daniel I. GoldbergCooley LLP | Sep 2020 | Text search only | 184 | 0.64 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Michael D. MalineGoodwin Procter | Sep 2020 | Text search only | 45 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 1.36 |