FCA US LLC C_OLD (last ticker on record)
CIK 1513153Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jun 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Dec 2011 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Schulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 296 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Cadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Feb 2011 · Text search only · 305 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Feb 2011 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Torys LLPFirst linked Feb 2011 · Text search only · 170 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Feb 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Dec 2011 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| Schulte Roth & Zabel | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 296 | 0.93 | 0.44 | 0.99 |
| Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Feb 2011 | Text search only | 305 | 1.14 | 0.24 | 0.95 |
| DLA Piper | Feb 2011 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Torys LLP | Feb 2011 | Text search only | 170 | 1.22 | 0.44 | 0.94 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Scott D. MillerSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Asset Purchase AgreementFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- David I. GottliebCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.50× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Marc WeingartenSchulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Richard A. PresuttiSchulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.11× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott D. MillerSullivan & Cromwell | Feb 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 47 | 2.40 | 0.00 | 1.30 |
| Asset Purchase Agreement | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 11 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 0.89 |
| David I. GottliebCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 20 | 2.50 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| Marc WeingartenSchulte Roth & Zabel | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 31 | 1.11 | 0.75 | 0.76 |
| Richard A. PresuttiSchulte Roth & Zabel | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 9 | 3.11 | 0.00 | 1.00 |