Theratechnologies Inc. THTX (last ticker on record)
CIK 1512717Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLPFirst linked Nov 2025 · Named in a filing · 159 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.69× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Jenner & BlockFirst linked Oct 2019 · Named in SEC correspondence · 122 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,688 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Aug 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 558 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Fasken MartineauFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in a filing · 126 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in a filing · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLPFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in a filing · 155 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP | Nov 2025 | Named in a filing | 159 | 0.92 | 0.69 | 0.85 |
| Jenner & Block | Oct 2019 | Named in SEC correspondence | 122 | 1.12 | 0.78 | 0.91 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Aug 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,688 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Aug 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 558 | 0.98 | 0.61 | 1.10 |
| Fasken Martineau | Feb 2011 | Named in a filing | 126 | 1.03 | 0.37 | 0.87 |
| Goodwin Procter | Feb 2011 | Named in a filing | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.16 |
| Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP | Feb 2011 | Named in a filing | 155 | 1.15 | 0.16 | 0.74 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jeffrey H. KurasHonigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLPFirst linked Nov 2025 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Martin C. GlassJenner & BlockFirst linked Dec 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey H. KurasHonigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP | Nov 2025 | Named in a filing | 17 | 0.96 | 0.00 | 0.56 |
| Martin C. GlassJenner & Block | Dec 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 1.46 |