Poage Bankshares, Inc. PBSK (last ticker on record)
CIK 1511071Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dinsmore & ShohlFirst linked Sep 2018 · Named in a filing · 96 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Dec 2014 · Named in a filing · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Norton RoseFirst linked Dec 2014 · Named in a filing · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLPFirst linked Dec 2014 · Named in a filing · 147 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Miller Nash LLPFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Luse Gorman, PCFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 301 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.21×
- Stites & HarbisonFirst linked Aug 2018 · Text search only · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.19× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.60×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Jun 2015 · Text search only · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Patton BoggsFirst linked Feb 2011 · Text search only · 186 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dinsmore & Shohl | Sep 2018 | Named in a filing | 96 | 0.64 | 0.24 | 0.64 |
| Fulbright & Jaworski | Dec 2014 | Named in a filing | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.35 |
| Norton Rose | Dec 2014 | Named in a filing | 304 | 1.11 | 0.52 | 1.24 |
| Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP | Dec 2014 | Named in a filing | 147 | 1.13 | 0.16 | 0.99 |
| Miller Nash LLP | Apr 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 41 | 0.43 | 0.00 | 0.90 |
| Luse Gorman, PC | Feb 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 301 | 0.58 | 0.06 | 0.21 |
| Stites & Harbison | Aug 2018 | Text search only | 35 | 0.19 | 0.00 | 0.60 |
| Ropes & Gray | Jun 2015 | Text search only | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Patton Boggs | Feb 2011 | Text search only | 186 | 0.92 | 0.76 | 1.35 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Victor L. CangelosiLuse Gorman, PCFirst linked Dec 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert I. LipsherLuse Gorman, PCFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.57×
- Mark R. LevyHolland & HartFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 2.50× · 95% wipeout 1.57×
- Marc P. LevyLuse Gorman, PCFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in a filing · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.44×
- Mary Ann FrantzMiller Nash LLPFirst linked Feb 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Kip A. WeissmanLuse Gorman, PCFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.49× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert B. PomerenkLuse Gorman, PCFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Jason L. HodgesVorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLPFirst linked Feb 2015 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victor L. CangelosiLuse Gorman, PC | Dec 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 39 | 0.26 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Robert I. LipsherLuse Gorman, PC | Apr 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 33 | 0.28 | 0.00 | 0.57 |
| Mark R. LevyHolland & Hart | Jan 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.79 | 2.50 | 1.57 |
| Marc P. LevyLuse Gorman, PC | Jan 2014 | Named in a filing | 49 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 0.44 |
| Mary Ann FrantzMiller Nash LLP | Feb 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| Kip A. WeissmanLuse Gorman, PC | Feb 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 51 | 0.49 | 0.38 | 0.00 |
| Robert B. PomerenkLuse Gorman, PC | Feb 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 0.28 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Jason L. HodgesVorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP | Feb 2015 | Text search only | 12 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 0.00 |