Xunlei Ltd XNET (last ticker on record)
CIK 1510593Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2014 · Named in a filing · 1,688 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Emmet Marvin & MartinFirst linked Jun 2014 · Text search only · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Jenner & BlockFirst linked Jun 2014 · Text search only · 122 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Patterson Belknap Webb & TylerFirst linked Jul 2011 · Text search only · 185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.51× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Goulston & StorrsFirst linked Jul 2011 · Text search only · 86 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- King & WoodFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 172 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Zhong Lun Law FirmFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Jun 2014 | Named in a filing | 1,688 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
| Davis Polk | Jun 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
| Maples and Calder | Jun 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,145 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.90 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jun 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.82 |
| Emmet Marvin & Martin | Jun 2014 | Text search only | 199 | 0.81 | 0.16 | 0.84 |
| Jenner & Block | Jun 2014 | Text search only | 122 | 1.12 | 0.78 | 0.91 |
| Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler | Jul 2011 | Text search only | 185 | 0.89 | 0.51 | 1.13 |
| Goulston & Storrs | Jul 2011 | Text search only | 86 | 0.90 | 0.34 | 1.29 |
| King & Wood | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 172 | 1.23 | 0.34 | 1.23 |
| Zhong Lun Law Firm | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 90 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 0.88 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David T. ZhangKirkland & EllisFirst linked Nov 2014 · Named in a filing · 118 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- James C. LinDavis PolkFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 76 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Z. Julie GaoSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 124 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Jonathan B. StoneSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked May 2014 · Text search only · 60 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.51× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Will H. CaiCooley LLPFirst linked May 2014 · Text search only · 73 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Timothy B. BancroftGoulston & StorrsFirst linked Jul 2011 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 1.90× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David T. ZhangKirkland & Ellis | Nov 2014 | Named in a filing | 118 | 1.03 | 0.61 | 1.24 |
| James C. LinDavis Polk | Jun 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 76 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 0.96 |
| Z. Julie GaoSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jun 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 124 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.99 |
| Jonathan B. StoneSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | May 2014 | Text search only | 60 | 0.51 | 0.00 | 1.19 |
| Will H. CaiCooley LLP | May 2014 | Text search only | 73 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Timothy B. BancroftGoulston & Storrs | Jul 2011 | Text search only | 14 | 0.91 | 1.90 | 0.64 |