Digital Cinema Destinations Corp. DCIN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1510326Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Jul 2014 · Named in a filing · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Eaton & Van Winkle LLPFirst linked Dec 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 1.45× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Dec 2011 · Text search only · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- MCNEES WALLACE & NURICKFirst linked Dec 2011 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 1.22× · 95% wipeout 0.44×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Dec 2011 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| King & Spalding | Jul 2014 | Named in a filing | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.04 |
| Eaton & Van Winkle LLP | Dec 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 49 | 0.35 | 1.45 | 1.17 |
| K&L Gates | Dec 2011 | Text search only | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| MCNEES WALLACE & NURICK | Dec 2011 | Text search only | 17 | 0.69 | 1.22 | 0.44 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Dec 2011 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alan J. PrinceKing & SpaldingFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.68×
- Joseph L. CannellaEaton & Van Winkle LLPFirst linked Dec 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.83× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Richard H. GildenKramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Dec 2011 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.33× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alan J. PrinceKing & Spalding | Aug 2014 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.45 | 0.00 | 0.68 |
| Joseph L. CannellaEaton & Van Winkle LLP | Dec 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 1.83 | 0.00 |
| Richard H. GildenKramer Levin Naftalis | Dec 2011 | Named in a filing | 24 | 0.33 | 0.00 | 0.56 |