Link Motion Inc.
CIK 1509986Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in a filing · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- JunZeJun Law OfficesFirst linked May 2012 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.78×
- White & CaseFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Jincheng Tongda & Neal Law FirmFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- King & WoodFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 172 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maples and Calder | Mar 2011 | Named in a filing | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Mar 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| JunZeJun Law Offices | May 2012 | Text search only | 6 | 1.72 | 0.00 | 1.78 |
| White & Case | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Jincheng Tongda & Neal Law Firm | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 26 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 0.63 |
| King & Wood | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 172 | 1.23 | 0.34 | 1.24 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Z. Julie GaoSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 124 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- David J. Johnson Jr.O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked May 2012 · Text search only · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Z. Julie GaoSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Mar 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 124 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| David J. Johnson Jr.O Melveny & Myers LLP | May 2012 | Text search only | 26 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 0.89 |