Civitas Therapeutics, Inc.
CIK 1509697Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked May 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Aug 2014 · Text search only · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Aug 2014 · Text search only · 1,224 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2014 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Aug 2014 · Text search only · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- DLA PiperFirst linked May 2014 · Text search only · 1,185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ropes & Gray | May 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 914 | 0.97 | 0.14 | 0.91 |
| Cooley LLP | Aug 2014 | Text search only | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.21 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Aug 2014 | Text search only | 1,224 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.12 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2014 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Aug 2014 | Text search only | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.06 |
| DLA Piper | May 2014 | Text search only | 1,185 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.17 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Bradley A. JacobsonGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Aug 2014 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Brian J. CuneoLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2014 · Text search only · 71 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.54× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.79×
- David PeinsippCooley LLPFirst linked Aug 2014 · Text search only · 86 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.53×
- Marc A. RubensteinRopes & GrayFirst linked May 2014 · Text search only · 48 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bradley A. JacobsonGreenberg Traurig | Aug 2014 | Text search only | 12 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
| Brian J. CuneoLatham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2014 | Text search only | 71 | 0.54 | 0.00 | 1.79 |
| David PeinsippCooley LLP | Aug 2014 | Text search only | 86 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 1.53 |
| Marc A. RubensteinRopes & Gray | May 2014 | Text search only | 48 | 0.64 | 0.56 | 1.25 |