Phoenix New Media Ltd FENG (last ticker on record)
CIK 1509646Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in a filing · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,397 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Zhong Lun Law FirmFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in a filing · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- DLA PiperFirst linked May 2011 · Text search only · 1,185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- White & CaseFirst linked May 2011 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Jones DayFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 685 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Apr 2011 | Named in a filing | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.14 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Apr 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,397 | 1.27 | 0.11 | 0.88 |
| Zhong Lun Law Firm | Apr 2011 | Named in a filing | 90 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 0.88 |
| DLA Piper | May 2011 | Text search only | 1,185 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.17 |
| White & Case | May 2011 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Jones Day | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 685 | 1.25 | 0.55 | 1.11 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 439 | 1.01 | 0.35 | 0.70 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 826 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.14 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Yi GaoSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jun 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Daniel FertigSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Feb 2024 · Text search only · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yi GaoSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jun 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 1.37 |
| Daniel FertigSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Feb 2024 | Text search only | 39 | 1.24 | 0.00 | 1.26 |