Qihoo 360 Technology Co Ltd
CIK 1508913Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jan 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Commerce & Finance Law OfficesFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in a filing · 157 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in a filing · 1,145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Jun He Law OfficesFirst linked Jan 2016 · Text search only · 73 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Emmet Marvin & MartinFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- King & WoodFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 172 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jan 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.82 |
| Commerce & Finance Law Offices | Mar 2011 | Named in a filing | 157 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 0.98 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2011 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Maples and Calder | Mar 2011 | Named in a filing | 1,145 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.90 |
| Jun He Law Offices | Jan 2016 | Text search only | 73 | 0.89 | 0.68 | 1.17 |
| Emmet Marvin & Martin | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 199 | 0.80 | 0.16 | 0.84 |
| King & Wood | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 172 | 1.23 | 0.34 | 1.23 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Daniel DusekKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jan 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Peter X. HuangSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jan 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.15×
- Z. Julie GaoSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jan 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 124 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Fan ZhangKirkland & EllisFirst linked Oct 2012 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- David T. ZhangKirkland & EllisFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in a filing · 118 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Eugene Y. LeeLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Mar 2011 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- Jonathan B. StoneSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Feb 2016 · Text search only · 60 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.51× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Will H. CaiCooley LLPFirst linked Feb 2016 · Text search only · 73 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Steve LinKirkland & EllisFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 63 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Benjamin SuKirkland & EllisFirst linked Nov 2013 · Text search only · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel DusekKirkland & Ellis | Jan 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Peter X. HuangSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jan 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 51 | 0.26 | 0.00 | 0.15 |
| Z. Julie GaoSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jan 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 124 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.99 |
| Fan ZhangKirkland & Ellis | Oct 2012 | Named in a filing | 8 | 2.29 | 0.00 | 0.81 |
| David T. ZhangKirkland & Ellis | Mar 2011 | Named in a filing | 118 | 1.03 | 0.61 | 1.24 |
| Eugene Y. LeeLatham & Watkins LLP | Mar 2011 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.95 | 0.00 | 0.63 |
| Jonathan B. StoneSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Feb 2016 | Text search only | 60 | 0.51 | 0.00 | 1.19 |
| Will H. CaiCooley LLP | Feb 2016 | Text search only | 73 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Steve LinKirkland & Ellis | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 63 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 0.99 |
| Benjamin SuKirkland & Ellis | Nov 2013 | Text search only | 40 | 0.80 | 0.00 | 0.65 |