Colt Defense LLC
CIK 1508677Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Jun 2015
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jan 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Herrick, Feinstein LLPFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 1.94× · 95% wipeout 0.32×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Young Conaway Stargatt & TaylorFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.50× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jan 2011 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Jan 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Herrick, Feinstein LLP | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 47 | 0.53 | 1.94 | 0.32 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 36 | 1.50 | 0.00 | 1.23 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jan 2011 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- William J. MillerCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jan 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.49×
- Ross E. SturmanCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Apr 2011 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| William J. MillerCahill Gordon & Reindel | Jan 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 0.49 |
| Ross E. SturmanCahill Gordon & Reindel | Apr 2011 | Text search only | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.41 |