VEREIT, Inc. VER (last ticker on record)
CIK 1507385Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jun 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 10-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2021 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked May 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Miles & StockbridgeFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in a filing · 71 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 0.46×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Venable LLPFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in a filing · 506 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Aug 2014 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Morris, Manning & Martin, LLPFirst linked Nov 2013 · Text search only · 105 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Nov 2013 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Seyfarth ShawFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2021 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Goodwin Procter | May 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Miles & Stockbridge | Jan 2013 | Named in a filing | 71 | 1.19 | 0.73 | 0.46 |
| Proskauer Rose | Feb 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.08 |
| Venable LLP | Feb 2011 | Named in a filing | 506 | 0.79 | 0.38 | 0.73 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Aug 2014 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 500 | 1.12 | 0.61 | 1.08 |
| Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP | Nov 2013 | Text search only | 105 | 0.58 | 0.34 | 0.86 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Nov 2013 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Ballard Spahr | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.73 |
| Seyfarth Shaw | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 102 | 1.57 | 1.38 | 1.25 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David H. RobertsGoodwin ProcterFirst linked May 2016 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.21× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Gilbert G. MennaGoodwin ProcterFirst linked May 2016 · Named in a filing · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- David RobertsO Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked May 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Peter M. FassProskauer RoseFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Steven L. LichtenfeldProskauer RoseFirst linked Feb 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Yoel KranzGoodwin ProcterFirst linked May 2015 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Philippa M. BondProskauer RoseFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Steven A. FishmanProskauer RoseFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.89×
- Daniel I. GanitskyProskauer RoseFirst linked Nov 2013 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.81× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- James A. TanakaProskauer RoseFirst linked Nov 2013 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David H. RobertsGoodwin Procter | May 2016 | Named in a filing | 12 | 2.21 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Gilbert G. MennaGoodwin Procter | May 2016 | Named in a filing | 33 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| David RobertsO Melveny & Myers LLP | May 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 0.46 | 0.00 | 1.12 |
| Peter M. FassProskauer Rose | Feb 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 35 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 0.64 |
| Steven L. LichtenfeldProskauer Rose | Feb 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 2.01 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| Yoel KranzGoodwin Procter | May 2015 | Text search only | 10 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Philippa M. BondProskauer Rose | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 10 | 1.61 | 0.00 | 1.05 |
| Steven A. FishmanProskauer Rose | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 17 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 1.89 |
| Daniel I. GanitskyProskauer Rose | Nov 2013 | Text search only | 8 | 1.81 | 0.00 | 0.58 |
| James A. TanakaProskauer Rose | Nov 2013 | Text search only | 13 | 1.21 | 0.00 | 0.79 |