Nautilus Marine Acquisition Corp
CIK 1507154Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Reeder & SimpsonFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in a filing · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 500 | 1.12 | 0.61 | 1.08 |
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Jun 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Reeder & Simpson | Jun 2011 | Named in a filing | 47 | 0.65 | 0.60 | 1.49 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Lawrence A. RosenbloomEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Dec 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Barry I. GrossmanEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 187 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 1.25× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Dennis J. ReederReeder & SimpsonFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.74×
- Stuart NeuhauserEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in a filing · 416 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Joshua N. EnglardEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Jun 2011 · Text search only · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 1.58× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lawrence A. RosenbloomEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Dec 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 51 | 1.16 | 1.35 | 1.31 |
| Barry I. GrossmanEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Jun 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 187 | 0.98 | 1.25 | 1.32 |
| Dennis J. ReederReeder & Simpson | Jun 2011 | Named in a filing | 30 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 1.74 |
| Stuart NeuhauserEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Jun 2011 | Named in a filing | 416 | 0.78 | 0.42 | 1.04 |
| Joshua N. EnglardEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Jun 2011 | Text search only | 58 | 0.95 | 1.58 | 0.98 |