Rich Pharmaceuticals, Inc. RCHA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1504389Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2014
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Feb 2015 to Apr 2018
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- The Doney Law FirmFirst linked Jun 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 46 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 2.34× · 95% wipeout 0.68×
- Szaferman, Lakind, Blumstein & Blader, P.C.First linked Sep 2014 · Named in a filing · 84 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 2.02× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Steven James Davis, A Professional CorporationFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.28× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Doney Law Firm | Jun 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 46 | 1.35 | 2.34 | 0.68 |
| Szaferman, Lakind, Blumstein & Blader, P.C. | Sep 2014 | Named in a filing | 84 | 0.59 | 2.02 | 1.04 |
| Steven James Davis, A Professional Corporation | Aug 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 2.28 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Scott DoneyThe Doney Law FirmFirst linked Jun 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 121 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 1.39× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Steven J. DavisLuce Forward Hamilton & ScrippsFirst linked May 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.86× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Gregg E. JaclinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLPFirst linked Sep 2014 · Named in a filing · 338 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.39× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- David S. JenningsFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 2.62× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Tomer TalNew Venture Attorneys P.CFirst linked Jun 2015 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.37× · Went dark 1.13× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott DoneyThe Doney Law Firm | Jun 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 121 | 1.04 | 1.39 | 0.86 |
| Steven J. DavisLuce Forward Hamilton & Scripps | May 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.00 | 2.86 | 0.73 |
| Gregg E. JaclinANSLOW & JACLIN, LLP | Sep 2014 | Named in a filing | 338 | 1.23 | 1.39 | 0.89 |
| David S. Jennings | Apr 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 1.33 | 2.62 | 0.81 |
| Tomer TalNew Venture Attorneys P.C | Jun 2015 | Text search only | 10 | 2.37 | 1.13 | 0.00 |