TREX WIND-DOWN, INC. TMBR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1504167Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Nov 2023
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- May 2020 to Dec 2023
- Law firms
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Akerman LLPFirst linked Feb 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Lowenstein SandlerFirst linked Feb 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 297 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Oct 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Sichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Jun 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,005 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Fenwick & West LLPFirst linked Jan 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 443 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Jul 2022 · Text search only · 963 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- Schulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Mar 2020 · Text search only · 296 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Nov 2016 · Text search only · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- John D. ThomasFirst linked Sep 2016 · Text search only · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.18× · Went dark 1.39× · 95% wipeout 2.35×
- Clark Corporate Law Group LLPFirst linked May 2015 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.62× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Hyman Phelps & McNamaraFirst linked May 2015 · Text search only · 105 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akerman LLP | Feb 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 211 | 1.09 | 0.67 | 1.36 |
| Lowenstein Sandler | Feb 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 297 | 1.12 | 0.70 | 1.42 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Oct 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| Sichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Jun 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,005 | 1.27 | 1.62 | 1.26 |
| Fenwick & West LLP | Jan 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 443 | 0.95 | 0.21 | 1.23 |
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Jul 2022 | Text search only | 963 | 0.96 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
| Schulte Roth & Zabel | Mar 2020 | Text search only | 296 | 0.93 | 0.44 | 0.99 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Nov 2016 | Text search only | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| John D. Thomas | Sep 2016 | Text search only | 19 | 2.18 | 1.39 | 2.35 |
| Clark Corporate Law Group LLP | May 2015 | Text search only | 14 | 1.28 | 0.62 | 0.85 |
| Hyman Phelps & McNamara | May 2015 | Text search only | 105 | 0.94 | 0.95 | 1.08 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alan WovsanikerLowenstein SandlerFirst linked Feb 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.06× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Philip B. SchwartzAkerman LLPFirst linked Feb 2020 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- Steven M. SkolnickLowenstein SandlerFirst linked Feb 2020 · Named in SEC correspondence · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.18× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Jorge del CalvoPillsbury WinthropFirst linked Oct 2016 · Named in a filing · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.82×
- Gregory SichenziaSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Jun 2016 · Named in a filing · 267 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.46× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Robert A. FreedmanFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Jan 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.86× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Puoy PremsrirutFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.56×
- Robert F. CharronEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Jul 2022 · Text search only · 62 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 1.11× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- John D. ThomasJohn D. ThomasFirst linked Sep 2016 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.95×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alan WovsanikerLowenstein Sandler | Feb 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 2.06 | 0.00 | 1.19 |
| Philip B. SchwartzAkerman LLP | Feb 2020 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.46 |
| Steven M. SkolnickLowenstein Sandler | Feb 2020 | Named in SEC correspondence | 69 | 1.23 | 1.18 | 1.36 |
| Jorge del CalvoPillsbury Winthrop | Oct 2016 | Named in a filing | 42 | 1.33 | 0.57 | 1.82 |
| Gregory SichenziaSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Jun 2016 | Named in a filing | 267 | 1.06 | 1.46 | 1.24 |
| Robert A. FreedmanFenwick & West LLP | Jan 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 69 | 0.86 | 0.53 | 0.96 |
| Puoy Premsrirut | Oct 2010 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.56 |
| Robert F. CharronEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Jul 2022 | Text search only | 62 | 1.42 | 1.11 | 1.26 |
| John D. ThomasJohn D. Thomas | Sep 2016 | Text search only | 13 | 0.90 | 0.68 | 1.95 |