Brookfield Residential Properties Inc.
CIK 1502554Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Dec 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Dorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 630 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Goodmans LLPFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 72 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.32× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Torys LLPFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 170 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Stikeman ElliottFirst linked Jan 2015 · Text search only · 225 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Nov 2010 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Kaye ScholerFirst linked Oct 2010 · Text search only · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Dec 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Dorsey & Whitney LLP | Oct 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 630 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 1.16 |
| Goodmans LLP | Oct 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 72 | 1.03 | 0.32 | 1.01 |
| Torys LLP | Oct 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 170 | 1.22 | 0.44 | 0.94 |
| Stikeman Elliott | Jan 2015 | Text search only | 225 | 1.08 | 0.11 | 1.06 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Nov 2010 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Kaye Scholer | Oct 2010 | Text search only | 161 | 0.88 | 1.03 | 1.00 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Neil Q. WhoriskeyCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Dec 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.39×
- Daniel M. MillerDorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.32× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Daniel MillerCassels Brock & BlackwellFirst linked Oct 2010 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neil Q. WhoriskeyCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Dec 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 1.90 | 0.00 | 0.39 |
| Daniel M. MillerDorsey & Whitney LLP | Oct 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 32 | 0.32 | 0.00 | 1.42 |
| Daniel MillerCassels Brock & Blackwell | Oct 2010 | Text search only | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.18 |