SSI Investments II Ltd
CIK 1501919Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- A&L GoodbodyFirst linked Oct 2010 · Text search only · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Oct 2010 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Oct 2010 · Text search only · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Oct 2010 · Text search only · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Oct 2010 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A&L Goodbody | Oct 2010 | Text search only | 85 | 1.14 | 0.00 | 0.56 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Oct 2010 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Maples and Calder | Oct 2010 | Text search only | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Ropes & Gray | Oct 2010 | Text search only | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Oct 2010 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Craig E. MarcusRopes & GrayFirst linked Oct 2010 · Text search only · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- David C. ChapinRopes & GrayFirst linked Oct 2010 · Text search only · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Jane D. GoldsteinRopes & GrayFirst linked Oct 2010 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.41× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- WILLIAM FRY WILLIAM FRYFirst linked Oct 2010 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- William FryFirst linked Oct 2010 · Text search only · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.40×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Craig E. MarcusRopes & Gray | Oct 2010 | Text search only | 45 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 0.94 |
| David C. ChapinRopes & Gray | Oct 2010 | Text search only | 30 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 0.72 |
| Jane D. GoldsteinRopes & Gray | Oct 2010 | Text search only | 22 | 0.41 | 0.00 | 0.56 |
| WILLIAM FRY WILLIAM FRY | Oct 2010 | Text search only | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| William Fry | Oct 2010 | Text search only | 16 | 0.59 | 0.00 | 0.40 |