Mecox Lane Ltd MCOX (last ticker on record)
CIK 1501775Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2012
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Oct 2010 to Mar 2013
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Jan 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Fenwick & West LLPFirst linked Nov 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 443 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in a filing · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Jun He Law OfficesFirst linked Oct 2010 · Text search only · 73 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- King & WoodFirst linked Oct 2010 · Text search only · 172 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Jan 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.96 |
| Fenwick & West LLP | Nov 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 443 | 0.95 | 0.21 | 1.23 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Oct 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Maples and Calder | Oct 2010 | Named in a filing | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Oct 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Jun He Law Offices | Oct 2010 | Text search only | 73 | 0.89 | 0.68 | 1.23 |
| King & Wood | Oct 2010 | Text search only | 172 | 1.23 | 0.34 | 1.24 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Peter X. HuangSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Dec 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 51 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.17×
- Fang XueGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Jul 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Karen M. YanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- David T. ZhangKirkland & EllisFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in a filing · 118 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter X. HuangSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Dec 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 51 | 0.26 | 0.00 | 0.17 |
| Fang XueGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Jul 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Karen M. YanLatham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.92 |
| David T. ZhangKirkland & Ellis | Oct 2010 | Named in a filing | 118 | 1.03 | 0.61 | 1.22 |