Invitae Corp NVTA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1501134Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Feb 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jan 2021 to Feb 2024
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Nov 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jul 2020 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Hyman Phelps & McNamaraFirst linked Jul 2020 · Text search only · 105 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Jul 2020 · Text search only · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Dorsey & Whitney LLPFirst linked Sep 2017 · Text search only · 630 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.83× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Feb 2015 · Text search only · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Nov 2014 · Text search only · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooley LLP | Nov 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Nov 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| Goodwin Procter | Jul 2020 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Hyman Phelps & McNamara | Jul 2020 | Text search only | 105 | 0.94 | 0.95 | 1.08 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Jul 2020 | Text search only | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| Dorsey & Whitney LLP | Sep 2017 | Text search only | 630 | 0.83 | 0.73 | 1.16 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Feb 2015 | Text search only | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Nov 2014 | Text search only | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew S. WilliamsonCooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.70×
- Charles S. KimCooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 118 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.41× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- David PeinsippCooley LLPFirst linked Nov 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 86 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
- Mike HirdPillsbury WinthropFirst linked Nov 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.82×
- Daniel I. GoldbergCooley LLPFirst linked Aug 2018 · Text search only · 184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew S. WilliamsonCooley LLP | Nov 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 32 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 1.70 |
| Charles S. KimCooley LLP | Nov 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 118 | 0.41 | 0.00 | 1.37 |
| David PeinsippCooley LLP | Nov 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 86 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 1.55 |
| Mike HirdPillsbury Winthrop | Nov 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.82 |
| Daniel I. GoldbergCooley LLP | Aug 2018 | Text search only | 184 | 0.64 | 0.00 | 1.03 |