GoPro, Inc. GPRO (last ticker on record)
CIK 1500435Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Oct 2026
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Oct 2014 to Apr 2025
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dinsmore & ShohlFirst linked Jun 2026 · Named in a filing · 96 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Fenwick & West LLPFirst linked Feb 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 443 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Feb 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Appleby (Cayman) Ltd.First linked Mar 2014 · Text search only · 77 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.62× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Mar 2014 · Text search only · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Mar 2014 · Text search only · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Feb 2014 · Text search only · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dinsmore & Shohl | Jun 2026 | Named in a filing | 96 | 0.64 | 0.24 | 0.64 |
| Fenwick & West LLP | Feb 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 443 | 0.95 | 0.21 | 1.23 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Feb 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Appleby (Cayman) Ltd. | Mar 2014 | Text search only | 77 | 1.62 | 1.12 | 1.18 |
| HALE AND DORR | Mar 2014 | Text search only | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Mar 2014 | Text search only | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Feb 2014 | Text search only | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Aman SinghFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Jun 2026 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.77×
- Julia ForbessFenwick & West LLPFirst linked May 2024 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Dawn BeltFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Jun 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.90×
- Allison B. SpinnerWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Feb 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.99×
- Cynthia C. HessFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Feb 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.86×
- Daniel J. WinnikeFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Feb 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.48× · Went dark 2.80× · 95% wipeout 1.63×
- Robert G. DayWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Feb 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 1.13× · 95% wipeout 1.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aman SinghFenwick & West LLP | Jun 2026 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.77 |
| Julia ForbessFenwick & West LLP | May 2024 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.65 |
| Dawn BeltFenwick & West LLP | Jun 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.90 |
| Allison B. SpinnerWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Feb 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 32 | 1.30 | 0.00 | 1.99 |
| Cynthia C. HessFenwick & West LLP | Feb 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 1.31 | 0.00 | 1.86 |
| Daniel J. WinnikeFenwick & West LLP | Feb 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 25 | 0.48 | 2.80 | 1.63 |
| Robert G. DayWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Feb 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 1.51 | 1.13 | 1.93 |