iSoftStone Holdings Ltd
CIK 1500308Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked May 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,687 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Nov 2010 · Named in a filing · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Han KunFirst linked Nov 2010 · Named in a filing · 178 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Nov 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked May 2014 · Text search only · 1,145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Zhong Lun Law FirmFirst linked May 2014 · Text search only · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Dec 2010 · Text search only · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Commerce & Finance Law OfficesFirst linked Nov 2010 · Text search only · 157 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | May 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 741 | 1.30 | 0.12 | 0.72 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | May 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,687 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Nov 2010 | Named in a filing | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.14 |
| Han Kun | Nov 2010 | Named in a filing | 178 | 1.08 | 0.35 | 0.85 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Nov 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.06 |
| Maples and Calder | May 2014 | Text search only | 1,145 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.90 |
| Zhong Lun Law Firm | May 2014 | Text search only | 90 | 0.53 | 0.00 | 0.88 |
| Paul Hastings | Dec 2010 | Text search only | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.08 |
| Commerce & Finance Law Offices | Nov 2010 | Text search only | 157 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 0.98 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stephanie TangShearman & SterlingFirst linked May 2014 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 1.83× · 95% wipeout 0.50×
- David T. ZhangKirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 118 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Jesse SheleyKirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
- Kurt BerneyO Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Feb 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.96× · Went dark 1.00× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Kurt J. BerneyO Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Nov 2010 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.89×
- Benjamin SuKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2014 · Text search only · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Benjamin W. JamesKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jun 2014 · Text search only · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Ning ZhangMorgan LewisFirst linked Feb 2013 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stephanie TangShearman & Sterling | May 2014 | Named in a filing | 22 | 1.49 | 1.83 | 0.50 |
| David T. ZhangKirkland & Ellis | Apr 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 118 | 1.03 | 0.61 | 1.24 |
| Jesse SheleyKirkland & Ellis | Apr 2014 | Named in a filing | 19 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 0.56 |
| Kurt BerneyO Melveny & Myers LLP | Feb 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 1.96 | 1.00 | 1.33 |
| Kurt J. BerneyO Melveny & Myers LLP | Nov 2010 | Named in a filing | 22 | 1.39 | 0.00 | 1.89 |
| Benjamin SuKirkland & Ellis | Jun 2014 | Text search only | 40 | 0.80 | 0.00 | 0.65 |
| Benjamin W. JamesKirkland & Ellis | Jun 2014 | Text search only | 47 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 1.31 |
| Ning ZhangMorgan Lewis | Feb 2013 | Text search only | 14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.65 |