BOLLINGER INNOVATIONS, INC. BINI (last ticker on record)
CIK 1499961Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Dec 2024
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Sep 2025 to Sep 2026
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Disclosure Law GroupFirst linked Jan 2022 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.42× · Went dark 0.88× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Jul 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLPFirst linked May 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 169 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Snell & WilmerFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.19× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & AxelrodFirst linked Jun 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Reed SmithFirst linked Jun 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in a filing · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in a filing · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disclosure Law Group | Jan 2022 | Named in a filing | 25 | 0.42 | 0.88 | 1.08 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Jul 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP | May 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 169 | 0.88 | 0.82 | 1.25 |
| Snell & Wilmer | Apr 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 244 | 1.34 | 1.19 | 1.38 |
| Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod | Jun 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 1.29 | 0.00 | 0.90 |
| Reed Smith | Jun 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
| DLA Piper | Sep 2010 | Named in a filing | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Maples and Calder | Sep 2010 | Named in a filing | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jeremy W. ClevelandCovington & BurlingFirst linked Jul 2024 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Katherine J. BlairManatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLPFirst linked Sep 2022 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.97× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Daniel L. WoodardMcDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Jan 2022 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Daniel W. RumseyDisclosure Law GroupFirst linked Jan 2022 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.54× · Went dark 1.16× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- John P. KennedyDisclosure Law GroupFirst linked Jan 2022 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Robert H. CohenMcDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Jan 2022 · Named in a filing · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 2.04×
- Thomas J. PolettiK&L GatesFirst linked May 2021 · Named in SEC correspondence · 71 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 1.24× · 95% wipeout 1.75×
- Joshua SchneidermanSnell & WilmerFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- David SchubauerSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Jun 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.79× · Went dark 1.69× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
- Serge PavlukSnell & WilmerFirst linked Jun 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.07×
- Yvan-Claude PierreReed SmithFirst linked Jun 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.96× · Went dark 1.66× · 95% wipeout 2.33×
- William N. HaddadVenable LLPFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeremy W. ClevelandCovington & Burling | Jul 2024 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.13 |
| Katherine J. BlairManatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP | Sep 2022 | Named in a filing | 30 | 0.95 | 0.97 | 1.22 |
| Daniel L. WoodardMcDermott Will & Emery | Jan 2022 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.08 |
| Daniel W. RumseyDisclosure Law Group | Jan 2022 | Named in a filing | 20 | 0.54 | 1.16 | 1.19 |
| John P. KennedyDisclosure Law Group | Jan 2022 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.49 |
| Robert H. CohenMcDermott Will & Emery | Jan 2022 | Named in a filing | 39 | 0.74 | 0.39 | 2.04 |
| Thomas J. PolettiK&L Gates | May 2021 | Named in SEC correspondence | 71 | 1.51 | 1.24 | 1.75 |
| Joshua SchneidermanSnell & Wilmer | Aug 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| David SchubauerSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Jun 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 1.79 | 1.69 | 1.59 |
| Serge PavlukSnell & Wilmer | Jun 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.07 |
| Yvan-Claude PierreReed Smith | Jun 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 30 | 1.96 | 1.66 | 2.33 |
| William N. HaddadVenable LLP | Sep 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 40 | 1.71 | 0.41 | 1.36 |