K2M GROUP HOLDINGS, INC. KTWO (last ticker on record)
CIK 1499807Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,397 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Hogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Jan 2015 · Text search only · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked May 2014 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Apr 2014 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Apr 2014 · Text search only · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Apr 2014 · Text search only · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jan 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,397 | 1.27 | 0.11 | 0.88 |
| Hogan Lovells US LLP | Jan 2015 | Text search only | 487 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.85 |
| Goodwin Procter | May 2014 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.16 |
| Morgan Lewis | Apr 2014 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.01 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Apr 2014 | Text search only | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.24 |
| Ropes & Gray | Apr 2014 | Text search only | 914 | 0.97 | 0.14 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kenneth B. WallachSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Ryan BekkerusSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
- Jason M. LichtLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2014 · Text search only · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Rachel W. SheridanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2014 · Text search only · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenneth B. WallachSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jan 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 31 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 0.85 |
| Ryan BekkerusSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jan 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 1.56 |
| Jason M. LichtLatham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2014 | Text search only | 35 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.91 |
| Rachel W. SheridanLatham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2014 | Text search only | 45 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 1.44 |