Lentuo International Inc.
CIK 1499673Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- K&L GatesFirst linked Jul 2013 · Named in a filing · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Nov 2010 · Named in a filing · 1,145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Nov 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Patterson Belknap Webb & TylerFirst linked Nov 2010 · Text search only · 185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.51× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Herbert SmithFirst linked Nov 2010 · Text search only · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.62×
- Jingtian & GongchengFirst linked Nov 2010 · Text search only · 154 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Jones DayFirst linked Nov 2010 · Text search only · 685 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K&L Gates | Jul 2013 | Named in a filing | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.20 |
| Maples and Calder | Nov 2010 | Named in a filing | 1,145 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.90 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Nov 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler | Nov 2010 | Text search only | 185 | 0.89 | 0.51 | 1.13 |
| Herbert Smith | Nov 2010 | Text search only | 90 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 0.62 |
| Jingtian & Gongcheng | Nov 2010 | Text search only | 154 | 1.10 | 0.63 | 1.14 |
| Jones Day | Nov 2010 | Text search only | 685 | 1.25 | 0.55 | 1.11 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Clayton E. ParkerK&L GatesFirst linked Jul 2013 · Named in a filing · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 1.96× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- John D. Owens IIIK&L GatesFirst linked Jul 2013 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.60× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Alan SeemShearman & SterlingFirst linked Nov 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clayton E. ParkerK&L Gates | Jul 2013 | Named in a filing | 129 | 1.18 | 1.96 | 1.35 |
| John D. Owens IIIK&L Gates | Jul 2013 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.60 | 0.00 | 1.25 |
| Alan SeemShearman & Sterling | Nov 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 34 | 1.25 | 0.00 | 1.20 |