ChinaCache International Holdings Ltd. CCIH (last ticker on record)
CIK 1498576Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2017
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Nov 2010 to Feb 2021
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in a filing · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Han KunFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 178 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Loeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Sep 2023 · Text search only · 838 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Sep 2010 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Patterson Belknap Webb & TylerFirst linked Sep 2010 · Text search only · 185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.51× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Commerce & Finance Law OfficesFirst linked Sep 2010 · Text search only · 157 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Sep 2010 | Named in a filing | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.16 |
| Han Kun | Sep 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 178 | 1.08 | 0.35 | 0.87 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Sep 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Loeb & Loeb LLP | Sep 2023 | Text search only | 838 | 0.92 | 0.99 | 1.10 |
| DLA Piper | Sep 2010 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler | Sep 2010 | Text search only | 185 | 0.89 | 0.51 | 1.17 |
| Commerce & Finance Law Offices | Sep 2010 | Text search only | 157 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Will H. CaiCooley LLPFirst linked Apr 2014 · Named in a filing · 73 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- Z. Julie GaoSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 124 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Lawrence S. VenickLoeb & Loeb LLPFirst linked Sep 2023 · Text search only · 164 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Will H. CaiCooley LLP | Apr 2014 | Named in a filing | 73 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 0.81 |
| Z. Julie GaoSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Sep 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 124 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| Lawrence S. VenickLoeb & Loeb LLP | Sep 2023 | Text search only | 164 | 0.85 | 0.42 | 1.12 |