CIM INCOME NAV, INC.
CIK 1498542Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 13
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Morris, Manning & Martin, LLPFirst linked Aug 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 105 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Venable LLPFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in a filing · 506 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Katten Muchin Rosenman LLPFirst linked Feb 2020 · Text search only · 268 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Feb 2020 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Fried FrankFirst linked Aug 2016 · Text search only · 540 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Nutter McClennen & FishFirst linked Aug 2016 · Text search only · 88 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Snell & WilmerFirst linked Aug 2016 · Text search only · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.19× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Sutherland Asbill & BrennanFirst linked Aug 2013 · Text search only · 130 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Alston & BirdFirst linked Oct 2010 · Text search only · 583 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Ettore A. SantucciFirst linked Sep 2010 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2010 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Sep 2010 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP | Aug 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 105 | 0.58 | 0.34 | 0.86 |
| Venable LLP | Aug 2011 | Named in a filing | 506 | 0.79 | 0.38 | 0.73 |
| Goodwin Procter | Sep 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP | Feb 2020 | Text search only | 268 | 0.76 | 0.58 | 1.22 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Feb 2020 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Fried Frank | Aug 2016 | Text search only | 540 | 1.33 | 0.24 | 0.94 |
| Nutter McClennen & Fish | Aug 2016 | Text search only | 88 | 0.75 | 0.47 | 0.85 |
| Snell & Wilmer | Aug 2016 | Text search only | 244 | 1.34 | 1.19 | 1.38 |
| Sutherland Asbill & Brennan | Aug 2013 | Text search only | 130 | 0.94 | 0.16 | 0.77 |
| Alston & Bird | Oct 2010 | Text search only | 583 | 0.99 | 0.39 | 0.79 |
| Ettore A. Santucci | Sep 2010 | Text search only | 14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.63 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2010 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Sep 2010 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Lauren Burnham PrevostMorris, Manning & Martin, LLPFirst linked Feb 2020 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Seth K. WeinerMorris, Manning & Martin, LLPFirst linked Feb 2020 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- David H. RobertsGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Dec 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.21× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- David RobertsO Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Dec 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lauren Burnham PrevostMorris, Manning & Martin, LLP | Feb 2020 | Named in a filing | 24 | 0.39 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Seth K. WeinerMorris, Manning & Martin, LLP | Feb 2020 | Named in a filing | 17 | 0.72 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| David H. RobertsGoodwin Procter | Dec 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 2.21 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| David RobertsO Melveny & Myers LLP | Dec 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 0.46 | 0.00 | 1.12 |