Mahwah Bergen Retail Group, Inc. ASNAQ (last ticker on record)
CIK 1498301Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Jul 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jan 2014 to Oct 2020
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Nov 2020 · Named in a filing · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jun 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Aug 2010 · Named in a filing · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Nov 2020 | Named in a filing | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jun 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Proskauer Rose | Aug 2010 | Named in a filing | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.08 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Marshall P. ShafferWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jun 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Joshua R. CammakerWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Jun 2015 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
- Andrew ZuckermanLewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLPFirst linked Jan 2011 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.81×
- Julie M. AllenProskauer RoseFirst linked Aug 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 0.50× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marshall P. ShafferWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jun 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.76 |
| Joshua R. CammakerWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Jun 2015 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.72 | 0.00 | 1.59 |
| Andrew ZuckermanLewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP | Jan 2011 | Named in a filing | 19 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 1.81 |
| Julie M. AllenProskauer Rose | Aug 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 41 | 1.49 | 0.50 | 1.38 |