ExamWorks Group, Inc. EXAM (last ticker on record)
CIK 1498021Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jun 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 13
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- BUTZEL LONG, a professional corporationFirst linked Apr 2012 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.86× · Went dark 2.83× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Aug 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Epstein Becker & GreenFirst linked Jun 2016 · Text search only · 115 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Fried FrankFirst linked Jun 2016 · Text search only · 540 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2016 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Dinsmore & ShohlFirst linked Apr 2012 · Text search only · 96 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Seyfarth ShawFirst linked Apr 2012 · Text search only · 102 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Apr 2012 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- White and WilliamsFirst linked Apr 2012 · Text search only · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Oct 2010 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Duane MorrisFirst linked Aug 2010 · Text search only · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 1.28× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Goodmans LLPFirst linked Aug 2010 · Text search only · 72 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.32× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Torys LLPFirst linked Aug 2010 · Text search only · 170 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUTZEL LONG, a professional corporation | Apr 2012 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.86 | 2.83 | 0.00 |
| Paul Hastings | Aug 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| Epstein Becker & Green | Jun 2016 | Text search only | 115 | 1.44 | 1.35 | 1.14 |
| Fried Frank | Jun 2016 | Text search only | 540 | 1.33 | 0.24 | 0.94 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | May 2016 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Dinsmore & Shohl | Apr 2012 | Text search only | 96 | 0.64 | 0.24 | 0.64 |
| Seyfarth Shaw | Apr 2012 | Text search only | 102 | 1.57 | 1.38 | 1.25 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Apr 2012 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| White and Williams | Apr 2012 | Text search only | 20 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 0.74 |
| DLA Piper | Oct 2010 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Duane Morris | Aug 2010 | Text search only | 413 | 0.76 | 1.28 | 1.06 |
| Goodmans LLP | Aug 2010 | Text search only | 72 | 1.03 | 0.32 | 1.01 |
| Torys LLP | Aug 2010 | Text search only | 170 | 1.22 | 0.44 | 0.94 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christian O. NaglerKirkland & Ellis | Aug 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 260 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 1.01 |