Vera Bradley, Inc. VRA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1495320Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Mar 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- 96%
- May 2011 to Apr 2025
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ice MillerFirst linked Sep 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 112 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
- Baker & DanielsFirst linked Jul 2010 · Named in a filing · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Foley & LardnerFirst linked Jul 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 498 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Jul 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Oct 2010 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ice Miller | Sep 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 112 | 1.19 | 0.21 | 0.93 |
| Baker & Daniels | Jul 2010 | Named in a filing | 129 | 1.11 | 0.45 | 1.22 |
| Foley & Lardner | Jul 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 498 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 1.02 |
| Winston & Strawn | Jul 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
| Morgan Lewis | Oct 2010 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Patrick DaughertyFoley & LardnerFirst linked Jul 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Steven J. GavinWinston & StrawnFirst linked Jul 2010 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick DaughertyFoley & Lardner | Jul 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 1.15 | 0.00 | 1.49 |
| Steven J. GavinWinston & Strawn | Jul 2010 | Named in a filing | 30 | 1.15 | 0.00 | 1.29 |