GLADSTONE LAND Corp LAND (last ticker on record)
CIK 1495240Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLPFirst linked Apr 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 97 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Venable LLPFirst linked Mar 2014 · Named in a filing · 506 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Aug 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Patton BoggsFirst linked Apr 2015 · Text search only · 186 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Hill Ward & HendersonFirst linked Dec 2012 · Text search only · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP | Apr 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 97 | 0.43 | 0.00 | 0.73 |
| Venable LLP | Mar 2014 | Named in a filing | 506 | 0.79 | 0.38 | 0.73 |
| Cooley LLP | Aug 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Patton Boggs | Apr 2015 | Text search only | 186 | 0.92 | 0.76 | 1.35 |
| Hill Ward & Henderson | Dec 2012 | Text search only | 34 | 1.58 | 0.00 | 1.04 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Abby E. BrownSquire Patton Boggs (US) LLPFirst linked Apr 2026 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Taylor K. WirthBarnes & ThornburgFirst linked Apr 2023 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.90× · Went dark — · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Mark BallantyneCooley LLPFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Daniel P. MeehanCooley LLPFirst linked Oct 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 1.62× · 95% wipeout 0.70×
- Brian F. LeafCooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Darren K. DeStefanoCooley LLPFirst linked Sep 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abby E. BrownSquire Patton Boggs (US) LLP | Apr 2026 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 1.43 | 0.00 | 0.97 |
| Taylor K. WirthBarnes & Thornburg | Apr 2023 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 1.90 | — | 0.00 |
| Mark BallantyneCooley LLP | Jan 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 29 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.31 |
| Daniel P. MeehanCooley LLP | Oct 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 1.32 | 1.62 | 0.70 |
| Brian F. LeafCooley LLP | Sep 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 43 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.25 |
| Darren K. DeStefanoCooley LLP | Sep 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 43 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.32 |