SafeNet Holding Corp
CIK 1494037Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 14
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Drinker Biddle & ReathFirst linked Sep 2010 · Text search only · 213 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Sep 2010 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Arnold & PorterFirst linked Sep 2010 · Text search only · 254 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.81×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Sep 2010 · Text search only · 1,185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Sep 2010 · Text search only · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Sep 2010 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Venable LLPFirst linked Sep 2010 · Text search only · 506 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Sep 2010 · Text search only · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jul 2010 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Gunderson DettmerFirst linked Jul 2010 · Text search only · 333 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.66× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Meister Seelig & FeinFirst linked Jul 2010 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Jul 2010 · Text search only · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jul 2010 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jul 2010 · Text search only · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drinker Biddle & Reath | Sep 2010 | Text search only | 213 | 1.46 | 0.77 | 1.26 |
| Morgan Lewis | Sep 2010 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.01 |
| Arnold & Porter | Sep 2010 | Text search only | 254 | 1.03 | 0.11 | 0.81 |
| DLA Piper | Sep 2010 | Text search only | 1,185 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.17 |
| HALE AND DORR | Sep 2010 | Text search only | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.22 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Sep 2010 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.66 |
| Venable LLP | Sep 2010 | Text search only | 506 | 0.78 | 0.38 | 0.71 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Sep 2010 | Text search only | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.23 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Jul 2010 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.75 |
| Gunderson Dettmer | Jul 2010 | Text search only | 333 | 1.17 | 0.66 | 1.28 |
| Meister Seelig & Fein | Jul 2010 | Text search only | 24 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 1.28 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Jul 2010 | Text search only | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.06 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jul 2010 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jul 2010 | Text search only | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.41 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David J. SegreWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jul 2010 · Named in a filing · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Mark R. FitzgeraldWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jul 2010 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.53×
- Michael C. LabriolaWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jul 2010 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.98×
- Steve L. CamahortShearman & SterlingFirst linked Jul 2010 · Text search only · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.47×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David J. SegreWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jul 2010 | Named in a filing | 55 | 1.34 | 0.00 | 1.49 |
| Mark R. FitzgeraldWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jul 2010 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.90 | 0.00 | 2.53 |
| Michael C. LabriolaWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jul 2010 | Named in a filing | 16 | 0.96 | 0.00 | 1.98 |
| Steve L. CamahortShearman & Sterling | Jul 2010 | Text search only | 56 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.47 |