Pactera Technology International Ltd.
CIK 1493639Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 15
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 11
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked May 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- King & WoodFirst linked Aug 2012 · Named in a filing · 172 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Aug 2012 · Named in a filing · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Aug 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 500 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.61× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Burns & Levinson LLPFirst linked Dec 2010 · Named in a filing · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Jun 2010 · Named in a filing · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jun 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Nov 2013 · Text search only · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Dec 2010 · Text search only · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLPFirst linked Dec 2010 · Text search only · 169 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Commerce & Finance Law OfficesFirst linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 157 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Debevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 424 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- White & CaseFirst linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | May 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| King & Wood | Aug 2012 | Named in a filing | 172 | 1.23 | 0.34 | 1.24 |
| Maples and Calder | Aug 2012 | Named in a filing | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Aug 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 500 | 1.12 | 0.61 | 1.08 |
| Burns & Levinson LLP | Dec 2010 | Named in a filing | 35 | 1.35 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Jun 2010 | Named in a filing | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.16 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jun 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Ropes & Gray | Nov 2013 | Text search only | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Cooley LLP | Dec 2010 | Text search only | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP | Dec 2010 | Text search only | 169 | 0.88 | 0.82 | 1.25 |
| Commerce & Finance Law Offices | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 157 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 1.02 |
| Debevoise & Plimpton | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 424 | 1.10 | 0.14 | 1.04 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
| White & Case | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paul StreckerShearman & SterlingFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.40×
- Ling HuangCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked May 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- W. Clayton JohnsonCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked May 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Richard V. SmithOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Aug 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Jeffrey J. SunOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPFirst linked Aug 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Chad J. PorterBurns & Levinson LLPFirst linked Dec 2010 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.70×
- Stephen D. BrookBurns & Levinson LLPFirst linked Dec 2010 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Kathryn King SudolSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Dec 2010 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 0.85× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Alan SeemShearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Chris LinSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Dec 2010 · Text search only · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 1.55× · 95% wipeout 1.65×
- Chao Yang DistrictO Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Dec 2010 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.57×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul StreckerShearman & Sterling | Nov 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.40 |
| Ling HuangCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | May 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.59 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| W. Clayton JohnsonCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | May 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Richard V. SmithOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Aug 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 26 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Jeffrey J. SunOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Aug 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 2.03 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Chad J. PorterBurns & Levinson LLP | Dec 2010 | Named in a filing | 7 | 2.61 | 0.00 | 1.70 |
| Stephen D. BrookBurns & Levinson LLP | Dec 2010 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.35 | 0.00 | 1.22 |
| Kathryn King SudolSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Dec 2010 | Named in a filing | 36 | 1.16 | 0.85 | 1.41 |
| Alan SeemShearman & Sterling | Jun 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 34 | 1.24 | 0.00 | 1.25 |
| Chris LinSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Dec 2010 | Text search only | 39 | 1.28 | 1.55 | 1.65 |
| Chao Yang DistrictO Melveny & Myers LLP | Dec 2010 | Text search only | 14 | 1.30 | 0.00 | 0.57 |