Nord Anglia Education, Inc.
CIK 1492966Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 19
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 439 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Fried FrankFirst linked Jun 2017 · Text search only · 540 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Goodmans LLPFirst linked Jun 2017 · Text search only · 72 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.32× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Paul HastingsFirst linked Jun 2017 · Text search only · 768 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Torys LLPFirst linked Jun 2017 · Text search only · 170 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- White & CaseFirst linked Jun 2017 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked May 2015 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Katten Muchin Rosenman LLPFirst linked May 2015 · Text search only · 268 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Grandall Law FirmFirst linked Mar 2014 · Text search only · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Han KunFirst linked Mar 2014 · Text search only · 178 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Allen & OveryFirst linked Jan 2014 · Text search only · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Jan 2014 · Text search only · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Jones DayFirst linked Jan 2014 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Travers SmithFirst linked Jan 2014 · Text search only · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Debevoise & PlimptonFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 424 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Norton RoseFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Maples and Calder | Dec 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Dec 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 439 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 0.76 |
| Fried Frank | Jun 2017 | Text search only | 540 | 1.33 | 0.24 | 0.94 |
| Goodmans LLP | Jun 2017 | Text search only | 72 | 1.03 | 0.32 | 1.01 |
| Paul Hastings | Jun 2017 | Text search only | 768 | 0.98 | 0.72 | 1.09 |
| Torys LLP | Jun 2017 | Text search only | 170 | 1.22 | 0.44 | 0.94 |
| White & Case | Jun 2017 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
| Baker & McKenzie | May 2015 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP | May 2015 | Text search only | 268 | 0.76 | 0.58 | 1.22 |
| Grandall Law Firm | Mar 2014 | Text search only | 36 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 1.34 |
| Han Kun | Mar 2014 | Text search only | 178 | 1.08 | 0.35 | 0.87 |
| Allen & Overy | Jan 2014 | Text search only | 244 | 1.00 | 0.36 | 0.66 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Jan 2014 | Text search only | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Jones Day | Jan 2014 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| Travers Smith | Jan 2014 | Text search only | 21 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.98 |
| Debevoise & Plimpton | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 424 | 1.10 | 0.14 | 1.04 |
| DLA Piper | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Norton Rose | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 304 | 1.11 | 0.52 | 1.24 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alexander F. CohenLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Bradley C. FarisLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.57× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.24×
- Dominik SklenarLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.96×
- Eugene Y. LeeLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- Ian D. SchumanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 91 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Marc D. JaffeLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 156 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Rod MillerMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloyFirst linked Dec 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Ji LiuFirst linked Feb 2014 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.47× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.71×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexander F. CohenLatham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 0.58 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Bradley C. FarisLatham & Watkins LLP | Jun 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 38 | 1.57 | 0.00 | 0.24 |
| Dominik SklenarLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.96 |
| Eugene Y. LeeLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.66 |
| Ian D. SchumanLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 91 | 1.06 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| Marc D. JaffeLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 156 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 1.12 |
| Rod MillerMilbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy | Dec 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 28 | 0.98 | 0.00 | 0.86 |
| Ji Liu | Feb 2014 | Text search only | 5 | 3.47 | 0.00 | 1.71 |