Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc. SBRA (last ticker on record)
CIK 1492298Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 16
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hogan Lovells US LLPFirst linked Nov 2022 · Named in a filing · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Fox Rothschild LLPFirst linked May 2019 · Named in a filing · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Hunton Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked May 2019 · Named in a filing · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- McCarthy TetraultFirst linked May 2019 · Named in a filing · 111 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Davis Graham & StubbsFirst linked Oct 2014 · Named in a filing · 142 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.97× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- Nixon PeabodyFirst linked Oct 2014 · Named in a filing · 196 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Smith Moore LeatherwoodFirst linked Oct 2014 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.95× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Sep 2012 · Named in a filing · 398 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Jan 2011 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Fried FrankFirst linked May 2010 · Named in a filing · 540 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked May 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Venable LLPFirst linked May 2010 · Named in a filing · 506 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Katten Muchin Rosenman LLPFirst linked Sep 2012 · Text search only · 268 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jan 2011 · Text search only · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Aug 2010 · Text search only · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Baker & HostetlerFirst linked May 2010 · Text search only · 231 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hogan Lovells US LLP | Nov 2022 | Named in a filing | 487 | 0.96 | 0.26 | 0.85 |
| Fox Rothschild LLP | May 2019 | Named in a filing | 149 | 0.92 | 1.38 | 0.90 |
| Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP | May 2019 | Named in a filing | 161 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
| McCarthy Tetrault | May 2019 | Named in a filing | 111 | 0.76 | 0.57 | 1.41 |
| Davis Graham & Stubbs | Oct 2014 | Named in a filing | 142 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 1.46 |
| Nixon Peabody | Oct 2014 | Named in a filing | 196 | 1.13 | 0.78 | 0.90 |
| Smith Moore Leatherwood | Oct 2014 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.95 | 0.00 | 1.09 |
| Andrews Kurth LLP | Sep 2012 | Named in a filing | 398 | 1.27 | 0.35 | 1.30 |
| HALE AND DORR | Jan 2011 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Fried Frank | May 2010 | Named in a filing | 540 | 1.33 | 0.24 | 0.94 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | May 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
| Venable LLP | May 2010 | Named in a filing | 506 | 0.79 | 0.38 | 0.73 |
| Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP | Sep 2012 | Text search only | 268 | 0.76 | 0.58 | 1.22 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jan 2011 | Text search only | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Aug 2010 | Text search only | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| Baker & Hostetler | May 2010 | Text search only | 231 | 1.11 | 1.12 | 1.35 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kenneth A. HoxsieHALE AND DORRFirst linked Jan 2011 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Shelly HeydukO Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Jan 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.23×
- Robert PlesnarskiO Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked May 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.88× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenneth A. HoxsieHALE AND DORR | Jan 2011 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Shelly HeydukO Melveny & Myers LLP | Jan 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 0.23 |
| Robert PlesnarskiO Melveny & Myers LLP | May 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 28 | 1.88 | 0.82 | 0.89 |