COCA-COLA EUROPEAN PARTNERS US, LLC CCE (last ticker on record)
CIK 1491675Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Nov 2010 · Named in a filing · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Sutherland Asbill & BrennanFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in a filing · 130 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.16× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked May 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked May 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- McKenna Long & AldridgeFirst linked May 2010 · Text search only · 62 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shearman & Sterling | Nov 2010 | Named in a filing | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Sutherland Asbill & Brennan | Oct 2010 | Named in a filing | 130 | 0.94 | 0.16 | 0.77 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | May 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | May 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| McKenna Long & Aldridge | May 2010 | Text search only | 62 | 1.33 | 0.27 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Lisa L. JacobsShearman & SterlingFirst linked Nov 2010 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Harry S. PangasSutherland Asbill & BrennanFirst linked Oct 2010 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Daniel ZimmermanCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jul 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Sean C. DoyleSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jul 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Jonathan I. MarkCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Jun 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Helene R. BanksCahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked May 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Martha E. McGarrySkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked May 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lisa L. JacobsShearman & Sterling | Nov 2010 | Named in a filing | 25 | 1.10 | 0.00 | 1.02 |
| Harry S. PangasSutherland Asbill & Brennan | Oct 2010 | Named in a filing | 22 | 0.00 | 1.33 | 0.00 |
| Daniel ZimmermanCahill Gordon & Reindel | Jul 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.78 |
| Sean C. DoyleSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jul 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Jonathan I. MarkCahill Gordon & Reindel | Jun 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 1.56 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Helene R. BanksCahill Gordon & Reindel | May 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 1.25 |
| Martha E. McGarrySkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | May 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |