TMS International Corp. TMS (last ticker on record)
CIK 1491501Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kaye ScholerFirst linked May 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Cozen O'Connor P.C.First linked May 2010 · Text search only · 163 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.63× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked May 2010 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Thorp Reed & ArmstrongFirst linked May 2010 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 0.48×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kaye Scholer | May 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 161 | 0.88 | 1.03 | 1.00 |
| Cozen O'Connor P.C. | May 2010 | Text search only | 163 | 1.03 | 0.63 | 0.94 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | May 2010 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Thorp Reed & Armstrong | May 2010 | Text search only | 17 | 1.10 | 0.98 | 0.48 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew B. BarkanFried FrankFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.58×
- Daniel J. BurskyFried FrankFirst linked May 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.33× · Went dark 1.50× · 95% wipeout 1.64×
- Joel I. GreenbergKaye ScholerFirst linked May 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew B. BarkanFried Frank | Apr 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 0.72 | 0.00 | 1.58 |
| Daniel J. BurskyFried Frank | May 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 28 | 0.33 | 1.50 | 1.64 |
| Joel I. GreenbergKaye Scholer | May 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 27 | 0.29 | 0.00 | 1.08 |