Velti plc VELTF (last ticker on record)
CIK 1490412Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2013
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jul 2011 to Mar 2015
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked May 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Brown RudnickFirst linked May 2012 · Text search only · 137 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.90× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Oct 2010 · Text search only · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Norton RoseFirst linked Oct 2010 · Text search only · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Oct 2010 · Text search only · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- K&L GatesFirst linked May 2010 · Text search only · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked May 2010 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | May 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| Brown Rudnick | May 2012 | Text search only | 137 | 0.84 | 0.90 | 0.97 |
| HALE AND DORR | Oct 2010 | Text search only | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Norton Rose | Oct 2010 | Text search only | 304 | 1.11 | 0.52 | 1.24 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Oct 2010 | Text search only | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| K&L Gates | May 2010 | Text search only | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | May 2010 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ed BattsDLA PiperFirst linked May 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.29×
- Peter M. AstizDLA PiperFirst linked Jan 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Edward BattsDLA PiperFirst linked May 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Sally J. RauDLA PiperFirst linked May 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.50× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.48×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ed BattsDLA Piper | May 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 2.05 | 0.00 | 2.29 |
| Peter M. AstizDLA Piper | Jan 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 1.51 | 0.77 | 1.41 |
| Edward BattsDLA Piper | May 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 2.49 | 0.00 | 0.98 |
| Sally J. RauDLA Piper | May 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.50 | 0.00 | 2.48 |