CHINA NEW BORUN Corp BORN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1490366Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Nov 2018
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Oct 2010 to Jun 2019
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Jan 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- B&D Law FirmFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- K&L GatesFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in a filing · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in a filing · 1,145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Commerce & Finance Law OfficesFirst linked May 2010 · Text search only · 157 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Apr 2010 · Text search only · 1,185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proskauer Rose | Jan 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.05 |
| B&D Law Firm | Apr 2010 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.47 |
| K&L Gates | Apr 2010 | Named in a filing | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.20 |
| Maples and Calder | Apr 2010 | Named in a filing | 1,145 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.90 |
| Commerce & Finance Law Offices | May 2010 | Text search only | 157 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 0.98 |
| DLA Piper | Apr 2010 | Text search only | 1,185 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.17 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Clayton E. ParkerK&L GatesFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in a filing · 129 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 1.96× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Matthew OgurickK&L GatesFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in a filing · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Thomas J. PolettiK&L GatesFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in a filing · 71 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 1.24× · 95% wipeout 1.74×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clayton E. ParkerK&L Gates | Apr 2010 | Named in a filing | 129 | 1.18 | 1.96 | 1.35 |
| Matthew OgurickK&L Gates | Apr 2010 | Named in a filing | 50 | 0.63 | 1.33 | 1.34 |
| Thomas J. PolettiK&L Gates | Apr 2010 | Named in a filing | 71 | 1.51 | 1.24 | 1.74 |