Aurora Diagnostics, Inc.
CIK 1490304Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alston & BirdFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in a filing · 583 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked Oct 2010 · Text search only · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Oct 2010 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Gunster Yoakley & StewartFirst linked Jul 2010 · Text search only · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.36×
- Lionel Sawyer & CollinsFirst linked Jul 2010 · Text search only · 128 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.88× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Warner Norcross & JuddFirst linked Jul 2010 · Text search only · 60 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alston & Bird | Apr 2010 | Named in a filing | 583 | 0.99 | 0.39 | 0.79 |
| Hogan & Hartson | Oct 2010 | Text search only | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.18 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Oct 2010 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Gunster Yoakley & Stewart | Jul 2010 | Text search only | 45 | 1.42 | 0.39 | 0.36 |
| Lionel Sawyer & Collins | Jul 2010 | Text search only | 128 | 1.07 | 0.88 | 0.96 |
| Warner Norcross & Judd | Jul 2010 | Text search only | 60 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 1.06 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- J. Mark RayAlston & BirdFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- George A. HagertyHogan & HartsonFirst linked Oct 2010 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Bruce C. YoungWarner Norcross & JuddFirst linked Aug 2010 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Mark RayAlston & Bird | Apr 2010 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| George A. HagertyHogan & Hartson | Oct 2010 | Text search only | 11 | 0.82 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Bruce C. YoungWarner Norcross & Judd | Aug 2010 | Text search only | 11 | 1.39 | 0.00 | 0.00 |