Groupon, Inc. GRPN (last ticker on record)
CIK 1490281Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began May 2026
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Nov 2011 to May 2023
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in a filing · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Fenwick & West LLPFirst linked Sep 2011 · Text search only · 443 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Sep 2011 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jul 2011 · Text search only · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Polk | Jan 2014 | Named in a filing | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Winston & Strawn | Jun 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
| Fenwick & West LLP | Sep 2011 | Text search only | 443 | 0.95 | 0.21 | 1.23 |
| Goodwin Procter | Sep 2011 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jul 2011 | Text search only | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Matthew F. BergmannWinston & StrawnFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.50×
- Steven J. GavinWinston & StrawnFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Lynda M. TwomeyFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Sep 2011 · Text search only · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Mark StevensFenwick & West LLPFirst linked Sep 2011 · Text search only · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.67×
- Lawrence M. ChuFirst linked Jul 2011 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.88× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.41×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matthew F. BergmannWinston & Strawn | Jun 2011 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 2.50 |
| Steven J. GavinWinston & Strawn | Jun 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 30 | 1.15 | 0.00 | 1.29 |
| Lynda M. TwomeyFenwick & West LLP | Sep 2011 | Text search only | 10 | 0.84 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Mark StevensFenwick & West LLP | Sep 2011 | Text search only | 21 | 0.39 | 0.00 | 1.67 |
| Lawrence M. Chu | Jul 2011 | Text search only | 5 | 2.88 | 0.00 | 2.41 |