Sabre Industries, Inc. SABR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1490224Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Locke LordFirst linked May 2011 · Text search only · 179 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Allen & OveryFirst linked Apr 2010 · Text search only · 245 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2010 · Text search only · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Apr 2010 · Text search only · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proskauer Rose | Apr 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.05 |
| Winston & Strawn | Apr 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.01 |
| Locke Lord | May 2011 | Text search only | 179 | 1.70 | 0.54 | 1.00 |
| Ropes & Gray | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 914 | 0.97 | 0.14 | 0.91 |
| Allen & Overy | Apr 2010 | Text search only | 245 | 0.99 | 0.36 | 0.63 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2010 | Text search only | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
| Mayer Brown | Apr 2010 | Text search only | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.93 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David A. SakowitzWinston & StrawnFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 47 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.36× · Went dark 0.88× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- James J. JunewiczWinston & StrawnFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- Julie M. AllenProskauer RoseFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in a filing · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 0.50× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Gary D. BossLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Apr 2010 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David A. SakowitzWinston & Strawn | Apr 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 47 | 0.36 | 0.88 | 1.14 |
| James J. JunewiczWinston & Strawn | Apr 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 1.33 | 0.00 | 1.37 |
| Julie M. AllenProskauer Rose | Apr 2010 | Named in a filing | 41 | 1.49 | 0.50 | 1.30 |
| Gary D. BossLatham & Watkins LLP | Apr 2010 | Text search only | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |