Fresh Market, Inc. TFM (last ticker on record)
CIK 1489979Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2014
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Apr 2016 · Named in a filing · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard, L.L.P.First linked Nov 2010 · Named in a filing · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.34×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked May 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Alston & BirdFirst linked Mar 2011 · Text search only · 583 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Oct 2010 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morgan Lewis | Apr 2016 | Named in a filing | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.01 |
| Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard, L.L.P. | Nov 2010 | Named in a filing | 52 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 0.34 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | May 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.82 |
| Alston & Bird | Mar 2011 | Text search only | 583 | 0.99 | 0.39 | 0.76 |
| Goodwin Procter | Oct 2010 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.16 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Howard A. KennyMorgan LewisFirst linked Apr 2016 · Named in a filing · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.20×
- Robert G. RobisonMorgan LewisFirst linked Apr 2016 · Named in a filing · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Damien R. ZoubekCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Mar 2016 · Named in a filing · 28 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Keith HallamCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Jun 2010 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Craig F. ArcellaCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked May 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.50×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Howard A. KennyMorgan Lewis | Apr 2016 | Named in a filing | 41 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 0.20 |
| Robert G. RobisonMorgan Lewis | Apr 2016 | Named in a filing | 20 | 0.42 | 0.00 | 0.91 |
| Damien R. ZoubekCravath Swaine & Moore | Mar 2016 | Named in a filing | 28 | 1.73 | 0.00 | 0.59 |
| Keith HallamCravath Swaine & Moore | Jun 2010 | Named in a filing | 22 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 1.28 |
| Craig F. ArcellaCravath Swaine & Moore | May 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 43 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 0.50 |