Lizhan Environmental Corp
CIK 1489784Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Kramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Aug 2010 · Named in a filing · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Aug 2010 · Named in a filing · 1,145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- AllBright Law OfficesFirst linked Aug 2010 · Text search only · 106 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 1.49× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- B&D Law FirmFirst linked Aug 2010 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Aug 2010 · Text search only · 964 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kramer Levin Naftalis | Aug 2010 | Named in a filing | 304 | 0.95 | 0.68 | 1.13 |
| Maples and Calder | Aug 2010 | Named in a filing | 1,145 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.90 |
| AllBright Law Offices | Aug 2010 | Text search only | 106 | 0.72 | 1.49 | 1.17 |
| B&D Law Firm | Aug 2010 | Text search only | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.47 |
| Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Aug 2010 | Text search only | 964 | 0.95 | 1.12 | 1.21 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Barry I. GrossmanEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Aug 2010 · Text search only · 187 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 1.26× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Bill HuoBecker & Poliakoff LLPFirst linked Aug 2010 · Text search only · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Christopher S. AugusteKramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Aug 2010 · Text search only · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.83× · Went dark 1.24× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Stuart NeuhauserEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLPFirst linked Aug 2010 · Text search only · 417 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barry I. GrossmanEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Aug 2010 | Text search only | 187 | 0.98 | 1.26 | 1.35 |
| Bill HuoBecker & Poliakoff LLP | Aug 2010 | Text search only | 31 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.49 |
| Christopher S. AugusteKramer Levin Naftalis | Aug 2010 | Text search only | 90 | 1.83 | 1.24 | 1.32 |
| Stuart NeuhauserEllenoff Grossman & Schole LLP | Aug 2010 | Text search only | 417 | 0.79 | 0.42 | 1.02 |